Nothing like a car exploding right outside your house to keep you on your toesREAD MORE
Got a photo story up on Vice on Rahat Open Surgery in New Delhi.READ MORE
The group I was a part of included journalists Nasr ul Hadi, Rajan Zaveri, Aayush Soni and my colleague at ITG Rohan Venkat. Our ‘techies’, who did much of the heavy lifting, were Piyush Kumar and Konark Modi. We were also joined by Yuan Lei, a journalism student from Shantou University in Guangdong. Since it’s been such an important story in recent weeks, we looked at how rape cases in India are treated by ‘the system’.
Before I get to our findings, I want to add a short note. We had just three hours to find data, organise it, clean it, ‘query’ it, and generate the visualisations. Not a lot of time. I’m sure a team working with more resources (particularly time) will draw more impactful conclusions. Our intention – since this was not a formal editorial process – was to start the conversation. We focused on three questions based on the data we had immediately available.
1. Adjusted for population, which states have the highest incidence of rape?
For brevity’s sake, we called this ‘rape probability’. In other words, how many rapes per thousand people. (Total reported rape cases/ State’s Population x 1000).
Some states such as Mizoram appear to have an unusually high ‘rape probability’. This may simply be because more rapes are reported, and not necessarily because women are more at risk. The national average was about 0.03 rapes per 1000 people.
2. If a rape case is reported in a state, how often does it result in a formal chargesheet?
We called this ‘chargesheet probability’. (Number of cases where charges are framed / Total reported cases x 100).
The clear outlier here is Manipur with just 9% of reported rapes ending in chargesheets. Is that only because of AFSPA? We cannot draw that conclusion until we know who the suspects are in each reported case. I also noticed an oddity. Three states – Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Tripura and Goa - have ‘chargesheet probabilities’ higher than 100%. We didn’t have time to find out why, so if someone out there could help in explaining that, I’d be grateful. The national average here was about 80%.
3. Finally, of the total reported cases, how many result in convictions?
We called this ‘conviction probability’. (No. of cases ending in convictions / No. of reported rapes x 100).
The outliers here are Nagaland and Sikkim with convictions secured in nearly 70% of cases that went to trial. Kerala was personally surprising with just a 2.7% conviction rate. The national average was about 18%.
Data sources: 2011 National Crime Records Bureau, National Census data
P.s. Even though we had the data, Google Fusion Tables would not generate visualisations for Jammu and Kashmir. It automatically marked the territory as ‘disputed’. Oddly, while it marks Arunachal Pradesh with similar diagonal lines, we still get the data represented on a map. I have contacted the Help Team about this and will post an update if I get a reply.
P.P.S Several states and U.Ts would show zero in their data fields. That’s mostly because data was either unavailable or could not be reliably ‘cleaned’.
SOURCE: http://www.onlineclasses.org/2012/11/05/ted-talks/ No one can deny that TED.com is one of the most successful and iconic idea-sharing platforms online. Si viagra cheapest online nce 2006, TED Talk videos have racked up over 800 million views. And it’s no surprise these videos went viral; with names…READ MORE